考研英语题,答案及解析全在这里!
What is to come might be worse still, if governments around theworld seek to kickstart the global economy out of its pandemicrecession by pouring public money into projects that prop up ex-isting industries and increase our dependence on fossil fuels. Forinstance, sectors including aviation, car manufacturing and fossilfuel production have been hard hit by the lockdowns, and manycompanies are hoping for aids using public money.
思考题:
According to the passage，the author believes that__，(单选)
A.ecological benefits of the pandemic maybe here to stay
B.it is unwise for government to stimulate the economy
C.industries 
with high carbon footprint may be replaced
D.governments may deepen our reliance on oil and gas
句子解析:
第一句:
what is to come might be worse still，(主干) if governmentsaround the world seek to kickstart the global economy out of itspandemic recession/l(状语) by pouring public money into proj-ects(状语) that prop up existing industries and increase our de-pendence on fossil fuels.(定语)
切分:
what is to come （主语从句) might be worse still，主干
llif governments around the world seek to kickstart the globaleconomy out of its pandemic recession状语从句
by pouring public money into projects状语从句中的状语
that prop up existing industries and increase our dependence onfossil fuels.定语从句( that指代projects )
参考译文:如果各国政府为了让世界经济走出疫情带来的大衰退，试图向一些支持现有产业且会增加我们对化石燃料依赖的项目注入公共资金，那么情况可能会更糟。
第二句:
For instance, sectors including aviation, car manufacturing andfossil fuel
production《定语} have been hard hit by the lock-downs,and many companies are hoping for bailouts using publicmoney.(主干}
切分:
并列主干1:
sectors have been hard hit by the lockdowns定语
including aviation, car manufacturing and fossil fuel production并列主干2:
many companies are hoping for bailouts ( aids ) ,using public money(状语} .
参考译文:例如，包括航空、汽车制造和化石燃料生产在内的行业因封锁而遭受沉重打击，许多企业都希望获得公共资金的敦助。
思考题解析:
A. ecological benefits of the pandemic maybe here to stay〔疫情的生态效益可能将持续)
A选项文章没有依据，，所以排除!
B. it is unwise for government to stimulate the economy〔政府刺激经济是不明智的)
没有说刺激经济是否明智。而是:
试图向一些支持现有产业且会增加我们对化石燃料依赖的项目注入公共资金
会带来不好的结果。
这属于偷换!
刺激高碳经济不明智≠刺激经济不明智!
C. industries with high carbon footprint may be replaced〔高碳足迹的工业可能被取代)
没有谈及!加了May也不对!排除!
D. governments may deepen our reliance on oil and gas〔政府可能会加深我们对石油天然气的依赖)
加了may而且第一句有依据!